Which approach utilizes a series of hierarchically organized categories for defect classification?

The approach that utilizes a series of hierarchically organized categories for defect classification is known as Defect Taxonomy. This method provides a structured way to classify defects based on their characteristics and impact, enabling teams to better understand the nature and severity of issues within the software. By categorizing defects hierarchically, teams can systematically analyze and prioritize defects, leading to more efficient and effective testing and quality assurance practices.

Defect Taxonomy is crucial as it helps facilitate communication among team members and stakeholders about the types of defects that are commonly encountered and their corresponding resolutions. This organized classification aids in identifying patterns and trends in defect occurrences, which can inform future testing strategies and improvements in the development process.

The other approaches, such as Static Code Analysis, Requirements Analysis, and Test Management, serve different purposes within the software development and testing lifecycle. Static Code Analysis focuses on reviewing code for potential vulnerabilities and adherence to coding standards, Requirements Analysis involves evaluating requirements for clarity and completeness, while Test Management pertains to organizing and overseeing the testing process itself, including planning, monitoring, and controlling testing activities. Each of these plays a vital role but does not specifically address the hierarchical classification of defects like Defect Taxonomy does.